Skip to site content

What can vertical SaaS platforms now do with the operating context they have spent years accumulating? 

That is becoming a more important question heading into 2027.

The conversation around AI and SaaS has understandably focused on disruption: which applications agents will replace, whether seat-based pricing survives, and how quickly features become commoditized. Gartner estimates that as much as $234 billion in enterprise application software spending could be exposed to “agentic arbitrage” by 2030 as agents begin completing work across multiple systems and reduce the need for users to interact directly with traditional software interfaces. Gartner’s July 2026 analysis goes one step further: enterprise buyers will increasingly value outcomes, institutional memory and customer context over more tools and dashboards.

For vertical SaaS, there is another way to frame the moment.

AI is increasing the value of context at precisely the point when mature vertical platforms possess more of it than ever before. In a September 2026 analysis, BCG argued that as AI models and tools become more commoditized, competitive advantage will increasingly concentrate around proprietary data, workflows and expertise. BCG’s analysis is written more broadly about AI strategy, but the implication for vertical software is clear.

A new entrant can build features quickly. Accumulating years of customer behavior, transaction history, workflow knowledge and industry-specific operating context takes considerably longer.

That is the asset vertical SaaS should be thinking about now.

I call it operational truth.

From recording the work to helping accomplish it

Vertical platforms increasingly see businesses in motion.

A field-service platform can see jobs booked, labor required, invoices generated and customers paying. A logistics platform can see shipments moving, revenue being earned and payment cycles stretching behind them. A distribution platform can see orders arrive, inventory turn, supplier obligations come due and receivables build.

The significance is less about the volume of data than the relationship between those events.

An outside provider might see declining cash in a bank account. The operating platform may know cash declined because the business just purchased inventory against a surge in orders.

A lender may see a growing receivables balance. The platform may know which customers owe the money, what was sold, when it was delivered and how those buyers have historically paid.

That is operational truth: understanding the commercial activity behind the financial numbers.

For years, much of this information has been used to make the software itself better—improving reporting, automating workflows, surfacing benchmarks and giving customers more visibility into their businesses.

The next opportunity is to make the information more actionable.

This is the strategic opening for vertical SaaS going into 2027: move from being the system that records the work to the platform that helps the customer accomplish it.

Capital is one of the clearest places to start.

Working capital is already part of the workflow

The demand is already there.

The Federal Reserve Banks’ 2026 Small Business Credit Survey found that 60% of employer firms applied for financing during the prior 12 months. Among those applicants, 56% were seeking capital to meet operating expenses and 46% were pursuing expansion, a new opportunity or business assets. Only 42% received the full amount they sought. The Federal Reserve’s 2026 report also found that expectations for future revenue and employment growth had fallen to their lowest levels since the 2020 survey.

That combination matters heading into 2027. Businesses are still pursuing growth while managing a more uncertain operating environment, and working-capital decisions sit directly between those two realities.

The need often originates inside the workflows vertical SaaS already manages.

A distributor wins an order but has to buy inventory before the customer pays. A contractor adds projects and needs to fund labor before invoices clear. A carrier incurs fuel, maintenance and payroll costs while waiting on shipper payments. A merchant sees demand accelerating and has to decide whether to commit more cash to inventory.

From the outside, each business may simply appear to “need financing.” Inside the operating platform, the circumstances can look very different.

That distinction creates an opportunity to make capital considerably more relevant.

Context can change the financing decision

Consider two businesses that each need $100,000 and look broadly similar through conventional underwriting: comparable revenue, similar cash balances, similar credit profiles and similar time in business.

One has completed $140,000 of work for repeat customers whose invoices historically clear within 60 days. The other wants to launch an untested product line with no existing orders or demand history.

The requested amount may be identical. The economic events underneath it are not.

The operating platform can provide context around those events because it may already see the underlying invoices, orders, customers, payment histories or inventory activity. Combined with sound financial underwriting, that creates a richer basis for determining the amount of capital, the appropriate structure and the repayment period the business can reasonably support.

The same principle applies across verticals. Long receivable cycles can point toward receivables financing. A supplier obligation associated with real customer demand can create a payable-financing use case. A recurring short-duration inventory cycle calls for a different structure than a multiyear expansion.

This is where the value of embedded capital starts to compound with the value of vertical software. The platform brings an understanding of the operating moment. The capital provider brings underwriting, funding and financial infrastructure. Together, they can make a financing decision with more context than either side would have independently.

Timing is part of the product

Operational context also changes when capital can become useful.

Take the distributor that receives an unusually large customer order. The opportunity exists today. Inventory has to be purchased before the order can be fulfilled, while the customer may not pay for another 60 days.

A financing process that takes several weeks can still be objectively fast by traditional lending standards and arrive too late to influence the business outcome.

A platform sitting inside that workflow has another option. It can recognize that a significant order has arrived, understand the customer’s historical activity and make an appropriate capital capability available closer to the decision itself.

That pattern repeats across industries. A contractor sees booked work rise before payroll increases. A logistics company completes the shipment before the receivable matures. A fleet needs a vehicle repaired before the cash associated with its next routes arrives.

The value of capital in those situations depends heavily on timing. The platform has an advantage because it can see the moment when action is still possible.

This expands what vertical SaaS can mean to the customer

Embedded capital will certainly create new revenue opportunities for some platforms. The more important strategic effect may be what it does to the role the platform plays in the customer’s business.

Vertical SaaS has traditionally helped customers manage work. Increasingly, the strongest platforms have an opportunity to help customers make the decisions that determine whether that work gets done.

A distributor wants products available when customers order them. A contractor wants enough capacity to take profitable jobs. A fleet wants vehicles on the road. An ecommerce merchant wants inventory available when demand materializes.

Software organizes those activities. Capital can help enable them.

That moves the platform closer to the customer’s actual business outcome and gives the accumulated operating context a practical use beyond reporting and automation.

It can also reinforce a powerful feedback loop. The platform sees more of the customer’s operation, which provides better context for financial decisions. Appropriate capital can then help the customer transact, purchase, hire, fulfill or expand through the platform. More activity creates more operating history, which improves the context available for future decisions.

For a vertical SaaS company thinking about durability in 2027, that relationship may ultimately matter more than another incremental feature.

Own the context. Partner for the complexity.

Using operational truth does not require a SaaS company to build a lending operation.

Underwriting, funding, servicing, compliance and credit risk are specialized businesses. Taking those functions in-house can introduce significant complexity and distract resources from the platform’s core advantage.

The higher-value role for the vertical platform is to remain close to the customer and the operating context: understand what is happening, determine where financial capabilities belong in the experience, and maintain control over how those capabilities are presented.

The capital partner can provide the infrastructure behind that experience.

That division becomes increasingly important as product roadmaps expand. AI is creating more things software companies can build. Strategy still requires deciding what they uniquely should own.

For vertical SaaS, the accumulated understanding of how customers operate belongs firmly in that category.

The advantage is already there

The defining opportunity going into 2027 may therefore be less about collecting more data and more about putting existing context to work.

Years of orders, invoices, transactions, schedules, shipments, payments and customer behavior contain a picture of how businesses actually operate. Advances in AI will make that context easier to interpret and act on, while embedded infrastructure makes it possible to introduce capabilities that once sat well outside the boundaries of a software platform.

Working capital is a natural application because the need already runs through the workflows vertical SaaS manages every day.

For platform leaders, the useful question is straightforward:

What do we know about our customers’ businesses that an outside provider cannot easily see—and what could we help those customers do because we know it?

For many vertical SaaS platforms, capital belongs near the top of that list.

The platforms that use this moment well can move beyond helping customers document what happened. They can increasingly help determine what happens next.


Ari Myers serves as Chief Commercial Officer at Kanmon, where he works with vertical software platforms, marketplaces, and other technology companies to build embedded capital programs around how their customers actually operate. His background includes leadership roles across fintech and SaaS, including EarnUp, Apollo, and Recurly.

More from Kanmon
Market Insight

Why merchants use working capital through the platforms they already use

View insight
Market Insight

How working capital helps distributors say yes to the next order

View insight
Market Insight

How do you use a line of capital as a growth driver?

View insight

Tell us what you've built.
We'll show you what's possible.